Save My Oddball Alma Mater – Washington Post Op-Ed

By Megan Rosenfeld

Saturday, July 21, 2007; Page A13

Geez, what did Antioch College ever do to George F. Will? My alma mater is on the skids, gasping for breath, and Will kicks sand in its face [” Forfeited Glory,” op-ed, July 15].

It’s easy to make fun of Antioch, which announced last month that lack of money would force it to close at the end of the coming academic year, 156 years after its founding. But why not look beyond cheap shots about hippies and radicals and ask why Antioch should be saved?
Bard College President Leon Botstein said recently that the closing of Antioch would be a “tragedy” and that the school is the “unfair victim” of liberals’ failure to give money to higher education (he noted that most instead endow programs to eradicate poverty and discrimination and to take on other worthwhile causes). As Botstein pointed out, small, independent colleges such as Antioch are needed to help preserve the goals of a free and just society and to educate those who will demand the responsive government we all deserve.

We need people who do not accept the status quo. “Antioch taught me to speak up for myself,” one graduate said at a recent meeting of shocked alums in Washington. We need people who have learned — in addition to history and science — to question authority.

There are a lot of reasons the school is going under, as fierce Internet traffic among alumni in recent weeks has shown. Blame it on the over-the-top radicals and the wimpy administrators of the 1970s; blame it on the tight-fisted alumni who felt unloved and responded in kind. Blame it on the multiple campuses and the unworkable governing structure that reigned over all with split focus and at times neglect. Blame it on lousy presidents, and the culture of consumerism, and, oh heck, blame it on Lindsay Lohan, too.

But don’t blame it on a failure of liberalism. That’s much too simple.

Institutions that experiment with the content of higher education, such as Antioch’s co-op job program combining classroom learning with real-world experience, often have a tough time keeping ahead of their mandate for innovation. The co-op job program, for example, has been obviated by the ubiquitous institution of internships and summer jobs for most college students. Other progressive schools, such as Bard, have found that courses in Greek, Latin and Sanskrit are avant-garde. But Antioch should be allowed to carry on its role as a laboratory for higher education. Our mistakes often save other schools time and money.

When my husband was at Yale, the unofficial motto was, “We go to school to learn to rule.” Maybe that’s one reason they have a $20 billion endowment. Our motto is, “Be ashamed to die before you have won some victory for humanity.” Maybe that’s why we don’t.

(The motto of Trinity College, George Will’s alma mater, is, “Pro Ecclesia et Patria” — for church and country. Not quite as inclusive as “humanity,” but I’m not criticizing.)

Our small campus in Ohio has always been a target for anyone with an anti-progressive bent. When I was there in the late ’60s, the tiny Ohio chapter of the Ku Klux Klan regularly marched down the main street of campus, apparently under the assumption that if Antioch vanished, the Klan’s racism could flourish. Some of us set up lemonade stands and watched the marchers from the sidelines.

The sexual-conduct pledge of the early ’90s came in for a lot of derision — but from what I’ve read and heard, date rape is not a problem at Antioch as it is on other campuses. All colleges today are petri dishes of social issues. When my son entered Temple University — a large, public, urban school — six years ago, he had to sign a pledge not to bring guns into his dorm. I talked recently with a woman who left Smith College a decade ago because she felt overwhelmed by pressure to be a lesbian. Antioch is not alone in incubating a kind of monolithic radicalism that allows for little deviation from leftist mantras. Our college leaders are aware of this problem and are wondering how to fix it.

Antioch has produced a suitable number of MacArthur “genius” award winners, doctors and lawyers, if that’s how you measure success. The proportion of Antiochians going on to get PhDs is one of the highest in the nation. We are proud to have never had a football team or a fraternity. To the best of my knowledge, “beer pong” was not invented on our campus.

Most of us alumni — who raised nearly $500,000 for an Antioch revival fund over the recent reunion weekend — do not want to preserve the starving, attenuated Antioch of today. We want our robust, challenging school back, the one that gave a home to oddballs of all kinds, that allowed the marketplace of ideas to flourish and that had a sense of humor.

If George Will hates us, we must be doing something right.

Megan Rosenfeld, a graduate of Antioch College, is a Washington writer and former Post reporter. Her e-mail address is rosenfeldm@verizon.net.

Antioch’s Democratic Difference – Letter in Washington Post

Letter to the Editor
Friday, July 20, 2007; Page A18

George F. Will’s July 15 op-ed, “Forfeited Glory,” argued that the suspension of Antioch College’s operations was caused by “repressive liberalism unleavened by learning.” The argument fails to fit the facts.

Antioch College’s governance structure is participatory and democratic and is no more toxic than any other democracy. True to its democratic ideals, Antioch has many powerful elected governance councils open to students, faculty members and administrators. As with any democracy, if a community member does not agree with a decision, that member can express displeasure at the polls or run for office. This is not a toxic culture; this is democracy at its best.

Above all, Antioch presents the student with every tool necessary for a world-class academic, experiential and democratic education, but it demands that students take responsibility for their own learning. This is an alien concept in today’s higher-education market, where students are predominantly customers purchasing an expensive service; most prospective students dare not take Antioch’s challenge.

Antioch is not as “user-friendly” as most colleges today, but it offers an unforgettable, challenging education that is second to none. A powerful coalition of outraged alumni, passionate faculty members and dedicated trustees will not let Antioch die.

JONAH LIEBERT

Woodside, N.Y.

The writer is a 2003 graduate of Antioch College.

Call for Letters to the Board of Trustees

 Update:  Deadline extended to Tuesday July 31, 2007

Community Government is calling for Letters to be written to the Board of Trustees. These letters
will be accepted in two forms, through email to the address
LettersToTheBoard@gmail.com and through snail/paper mail to:

Community Government
795 Livermore Street
Yellow Springs, OH 45387

The intent of these letters is to express why you think Antioch should
stay open, what Antioch means to you and a statement of your support for the college. All of these letters will be
compiled into a book and sent directly to each Board Member, with the
intention to persuade them to reverse their decision to suspend operations of
Antioch College at the Emergency Board Meeting in August. These letters
will be accepted no later than Tuesday, July 31st
. That deadline is really
soon, but gives us enough time to take the emails and compile them into a
book.

We urge you to be both respectful and constructive in your comments. Also, please include your class year to demonstrate our broad, intergenerational support of this effort. If you have any questions contact Community Manager Rory Adams-Cheatham at vadams@antioch-college.edu.

George Comstock, Esteemed Epidemiologist and Proud Antiochian Passes On

From LA Times

Dr. George W. Comstock, a pioneering epidemiologist who almost single-handedly blocked the use of the flawed BCG tuberculosis vaccine in the United States and who played a key role in the development of other prevention strategies against the disease, died Sunday at his home in Smithsburg, Md. He was 92 and had battled prostate cancer for several years.

.Comstock was a young commissioned officer in the U.S. Public Health Service after World War II when federal officials were considering a mass vaccination campaign against tuberculosis using the relatively new Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccine, which is made from an attenuated strain of mycobacterium that produces TB in cows.

He organized a trial of the BCG vaccine in Georgia and Alabama that stretched from 1947 to 1951 and concluded that the vaccine had an efficacy of only 14% in preventing the disease. He argued forcefully that the efficacy was too low to produce widespread benefit and that vaccination would render the Mantoux skin test for detecting TB infections useless by making vaccine recipients permanently positive.

In a country like the United States, with a relatively low incidence of TB, he argued, it was more important to be able to identify those exposed to the mycobacterium and treat them. Federal authorities agreed, and the vaccine was never widely used here.

“He always saw this as one of his most important contributions,” said Dr. Jonathan Samet, chairman of the department of epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where Comstock taught for more than 40 years.

In the 1950s, after the development of the TB drug isoniazid, Comstock learned that Alaska had one of the highest TB rates in the world.

He moved his family to Bethel, Alaska, and began administering the drug to everyone who had been exposed to the mycobacterium — as well as to himself and his family.

He showed that the drug could prevent infections from progressing to full-blown TB, and that the optimum treatment time with the drug was nine months. The protocol he developed for therapy — still in use — was a major contributor in bringing the outbreak in Alaska under control.

After 21 years in the Public Health Service, Comstock retired and joined Hopkins, where he founded the university’s Training Center for Public Health Research and Prevention in Hagerstown, Md. — a unit that was renamed after him in 2004.

He pioneered work in community-based health studies looking for the causes of cancer, heart disease, eye disease and other ailments.

He was among the first to collect blood and other biological samples that were frozen and stored for future analysis. By looking at samples from patients who developed cancer, for example, the researchers could determine whether there were any substances in the blood that might have predicted the onset of the disease.

There was great interest at the time in whether consuming supplements containing vitamin A and beta-carotene might reduce the risk of lung cancer among smokers. His studies showed that, at best, there was only a small association between higher levels of the supplements and a reduced risk.

George Wills Comstock was born Jan. 7, 1915, in Niagara Falls, N.Y. While pursuing his undergraduate studies at Antioch College in Ohio, he obtained a part-time job at Eli Lilly’s pharmaceutical laboratory.

He worked in a lab that studied pellagra.

Although his job “mostly involved washing glassware and cleaning dog cages,” he later said, his boss persuaded him to switch from biochemistry to medicine and to attend Harvard Medical School.

Upon graduation from Harvard, he joined the Public Health Service because it paid more than a conventional internship.

He subsequently received a master’s degree in public health from the University of Michigan and a doctorate from Johns Hopkins.

Outside of medicine, Comstock’s passion was music. He was a woodwind player in various symphony orchestras and for many summers took part in recorder camps. “Early music” was frequently heard in his household; he taught the entire family to play the recorder.

Comstock frequently quoted Horace Mann’s 1859 commencement address at Antioch College: “Be ashamed to die before you have won some victory for humanity.” Comstock expanded on that theme, noting that “most of us aren’t going to win any big victories, but we can win little ones every day, and they mount up.”

Comstock’s wife of 60 years, Margaret Karr Comstock, died in 1999. In 2001, he married the former Emma Lou Davis.

In addition to his wife, Comstock is survived by two sons, Dr. Gordon Frederick Comstock of Arcade, N.Y., and Dr. Lloyd Karr Comstock of Chapel Hill, N.C.; a daughter, Martha Wills Comstock Williams of Marietta, Ga.; five grandchildren; one great-granddaughter; two stepchildren; and two step-grandchildren.

thomas.maugh@latimes.com

Antioch Alum Responds to George Will Op/Ed., July 16

George Will is in fact correct, founded in 1852; Antioch’s first president was Horace Mann-the father of American public education. Antioch was indeed among the first nonsectarian colleges, among the first to offer equal compensation and opportunity to male and female faculty, among the first to offer an equal curriculum to women and blacks. At the time that Antioch made those choices, it was roundly criticized by the reactionary social commentators of the day just as it is today by Mr. Will and his ilk.

Without question, Antioch has faced financial challenges throughout its history. Yet even with modest financial resources it has proven to be one of the great academic incubators among American liberal arts colleges. Mr. Will makes note of just a few of our noteworthy alumni. A complete accounting of the contributions of our graduates to health care, scientific invention, artistic excellence, and social justice would be excessive in this brief reply, but what is worth noting is that such a small and as Mr. Will suggests insignificant college should produce so many people who have contributed so much to our collective quality of life.

This is a time of distress and concern for those of us who feel the survival of Antioch in imperative. The scathing rebuke of a one-hundred and fifty year-old college and its students throughout the generations offered by Mr. Will is at best wholly unfair and at worst mean spirited. Antioch has been a beacon for progressive thinking, yes and as a result it has always and will remain a lighting-rod for those who benefit from the status quo.

Mr. Will’s alma mater Trinity College has a deservedly fine reputation. It was historically a member of an elite class of liberal arts colleges that for generations educated the privileged in American society. Although it has had more presidents in the past ten years than Antioch, it has generally been a well funded and ably led institution. Antioch is not struggling today because its brand of education is out of favor as Mr. Will suggests, it has failed to thrive because it has never been a wealthy college and of late, when the financial stakes became very high, it has not been ably led.

While Mr. Will may find it “heartening” that Antioch will in his view close, we hope that thinking individuals with predilections leaning to the right or the left of the political spectrum would disagree. It is a chilling thought to consider the loss of a college of such significance as well as a possible warning sign to other progressive colleges. In a nation where institutions like Bob Jones and Liberty are growing and becoming wealthier, we hope that those who have a more expansive view of what the landscape of American higher education should look like will rally to the defense of Antioch.

Mr. Will is right about one more item. Antioch will not be missed. We intend to make sure that Antioch College will in fact not close. It is our fondest wish, as the very proud alumni and friends of Antioch, to prove George Will wrong. We are grateful for the motivation he has provided as we embark on saving and strengthening one of the most important educational institutions in the nation.

Matthew Derr
Antioch College Class of 1989

Meeting of the Executive Committee of the Alumni Board of Directors, July 10

Meeting of the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors
Antioch College Alumni/ae Association
By dial-in conference call
4:00 p.m. EDT July 10, 2007

Committee members present

Nancy Crow, President
Ina Frank, Vice President
Rick Daily, Treasurer
Mike Brower, Chapters Committee
Ellen Borgersen, Governance Committee
Athena Frederick, Communications Committee

I. Reports from the President
A. John Feinberg is still on an airplane, and can’t serve as Recording Secretary. At Nancy’s request, Rick will serve for this meeting. The minutes of this meeting, once corrected by the group, should be sent to “webeditors@antiochians.org.” for public posting.
B. Nancy has a letter from Steve Lawry, labeled “confidential” which merits discussion among a larger body. She will ask Steve for permission to expand its reach.
C. A special meeting of the Antioch University Board of Trustees will be held on August 24-26; location is likely to be Chicago.
D. Reunion Committee: Nancy has reappointed Bradley Wilburn to serve as Committee Chair, and asked him to make sure that we have a strong, dramatic reunion in 2008.
E. Nominating Committee – Nancy has a call in to Susan Opotow to ask whether she will serve as chair of the Nominating Committee.
F. Anecdote: Nancy reported that at Denver’s Cherry Creek Arts Festival – a ceramicist from YSO was in attendance. When asked what will happen to Antioch, the ceramicist replied: “The Alumni are going to save the College!”
II. Nancy Crow letter to Art Zucker
A. Addressees: The sense of the Committee is that Nancy should talk with Art, and ask who else should get this letter.
B. How detailed should it be?
1. Offer to work with various task forces vs. presentation of an alternative plan
2. Nancy thinks we should come into the August Board Meeting with as detailed a proposal as we can possibly get. The consensus is that we should be working on this detailed plan.
C. Ellen: Our plan needs to take into account moving parts that work together:
1. Plan for an interim period of reduced operations; relaunch of full operations, and sustained operations. we work with faculty.
a) Faculty (E. Miller) have been focused on legal plans and negotiations, and not on curriculum.
D. Nancy: Board of Trustees has concluded that suspension is required.
E. Ellen: There are documents out there that are being used to plan the “new Antioch”
F. Should we demand transparency from the Board of Trustees? Better message: We need to be where decisions are being discussed and made, which we believe means more participation than having our Chair serve ex officio on the Board of Trustees.
G. Specific fundraising targets: we avoid specificity for now; plan to have a good number by late August.
H. Communicate the sense of urgency among the alumni/ae.
1. E.g., Faculty Layoff notices: We don’t yet know what the terms of the layoff notices are, how much notice is being given and what rehiring rights or preferential rights any current faculty members may have if the College is shut and reopened.
I. The Business Plan and the Curriculum Plan are two separate issues, and need to be treated as such.
J. “Closing” vs. continuing operations. We can’t tie ourselves into a position that we’re going to guarantee that the College will not close.
III. Committee Assignments.
A. Nancy has sent out a full list of Committee and task group assignments, and will republish it.
IV. § 501(c)(3) status. Motion to create separate corporation to become a § 501(c)(3) organization, which will take the money, and serve as the College Revival Fund. The mission of the College Revival Fund is to develop a business plan for the College, build a separate governing board for the College, and to raise funds for the continued operation of the College.
V. Treasurer’s Report. Rick reported that the total of pledges and donations is still roughly $525,000. He is busy doing data entry, cross-referencing donations with pledges.
VI. Chapters. Mike Brower reported that before the BOT announced suspending Antioch College we had 7 Alumni/ae Chapters around the country each of which had held at least one meeting. Today, the web page “chapters@antiochians.org” lists 16 Chapters, which means we more than doubled the number of Chapters in one month. Mike reported that he has a list of another half a dozen or more cities in which organizers are working and planning for their first meeting. Very soon we should have over 2 dozen active chapters — or even more if we count the separate Chapters being formed in various boroughs of New York City, probably soon to be followed by separate locations in greater LA. By a month from now we could easily have 30 active chapters in the US and also in Paris and London!
VII. Fundraising (Ina). Ina reported that at last night’s meeting, a donor announced his intention to relocate his pledge to the Revival Fund from the Annual Fund. People are incredibly motivated to act now to raise funds, to capture the momentum on the fundraising front.
A. Foundations. On the foundation front, we need two years minimum of “in the black” balance sheets. We have begun research done on the likely donors. The Alumni/Individual piece is critical to credibility.
B. Corporate relations. Terry Blackhawk has taken on Corporate Relations.
C. Marketing Sub-Committee. We need someone whose job is marketing, media relations, mini-DVD concept. Mike will ask the Chapters to identify a seasoned marketing professional to come on board.
D. Fundraising Plan. Ina will send out a summary fundraising plan within the next day.
VIII. Public Relations. Athena described her efforts to coordinate media relations issues.
IX. Governance. Ellen sent her committee list around via e-mail. Everyone likes the “Antioch 3.0” concept. She will put together a concept paper on this topic for immediate circulation.
X. Association Board Meeting. Brief discussion of whether there should be a meeting of the ACAA Board before our scheduled November Meeting. Rick moved that we have a conference call meeting of the full Board within 2-3 weeks. The motion was seconded and adopted by all voting. Nancy will look at rescheduling the Fall Alumni/ae Board Meeting to coincide with the Board of Trustees meeting.